On a Saturday in October 2010, a group of volunteers fanned out to five locations across the city to run a usability test to learn how New Yorkers marked their new optical scan ballots, especially looking for a kind of error called “double voting” (voting for one candidate under more than one party).
Our goal was to improve voter education, election procedures, and how voters are informed about possible errors on their ballots.
The research challenge was working quickly so the The Brennan Center had data as input for their advocacy work.
Our solution was what we call flash testing. We go where the voters are, fanning out to places like libraries, farmers markets, and street corners. But instead of just gathering opinions, we asked them to sit down for ten minutes and try marking a ballot.
The day started by getting everyone together for a briefing, making sure that all of the teams worked in a consistent way and were gathering the same data. We also wanted to make sure that the professionals volunteers who had never worked in civic design understood the importance of being strictly non-partisan and welcoming diverse participants to the usability testing.
By the end of four hours in the field,we’d watched over 200 people. We’d collected enough marked ballots to analyze them for errors and places where people had struggled to understand how to mark their ballot accurately.
And, we had some ideas for how to explain to voters how to avoid making a mistake on their ballot.
A year later, the Board of Elections agreed to