Ballot design

Ballots that can be marked privately and independently are at the heart of the voter journey.

Ballot design is hard because there are so many constraints —legislation, voting systems, language requirements, and litigation for  hundreds of different ballot styles that have to be designed in the few weeks between the end of candidate filing and sending the first ballots to overseas voters. 

Center for Civic Design’s work started even before the organization was official, working on ballot design in the years following the butterfly ballots of the 2000 presidential election. Our first best practices in the Field Guides to Ensure Voter Intent are about ballot design and instructions. Those guidelines are still important today.

We’ve seen that well-designed ballots give voters confidence. And that ballots can fool voters into overvoting (so their vote in that contest doesn’t count) or undervoting (missing an opportunity to make a choice) when they have design defects.


Tools


Ballot design subtopics

Ballot questions

Words to time calculator: A free online tool to get a reading time estimate based on word count and slow, average and fast reading speed. We used this calculator to determine an estimate of how long it would take to read 1,000 words on a ballot.

Provisional ballots


Press


Our work

Toolkit: Guidance for usability testing ballots and voting systems
These guidance documents and the accompanying sample materials and templates, support usability testing with voters and with poll workers.

Toolkit: The usability of electronic poll books

This 2014 project looked at the electronic poll books being used in elections and how to make them usable. The report includes:

  • A checklist for usability and accessibility
  • A usability test plan
  • Landscape analysis of systems

Project: Anywhere ballot: What if anyone could vote on any device
Design research for a universal electronic ballot marking interface that every voter can use. Includes:

Research: Voter verification of paper ballots
A two-part report that included qualitative research project to gain deeper insights into how voters mark, review, verify, and cast their ballots. It looked at the role the design of the voting interaction and overall voting process plays in encouraging voters to carefully check their ballot before casting it and  a review of the literature. (Pre-publication versions of report for NIST)

Research: Legibility of paper ballots: What makes a printed summary-style ballot easy to verify?
An exploration of design characteristics of summary ballots and whether they are readable visually and with optical scan recognition (OCR) tools for accessibility. (Pre-publication version of a report for NIST)

Research: Developing voting system requirements for VVSG 2.0  
The roadmap for this work along with white papers and other materials from the process. 

White paper: Ballot simplicity, constraints, and design literacy 
There’s actually nothing simple about voting in the United States — especially interacting with ballots. This report covers the history and constraints in designing a ballot

Research from partners in the election field

The Brennan Center: Ballot design project
We have collaborated with legal and political science experts at the Brennan Center since 2008. Research reports include analysis of election data and recommendations for how to fix them. Major reports we have contributed to include:

The Election Assistance Commission