In Colorado, less than five percent of Medicaid applicants who saw an explicit voter registration
question (i.e., Do you want to register to vote?) were opting in. We worked with CO to improve AVR rates.
Instead of asking people if they want to register, which can be a risky question to answer for people who aren’t eligible to register, we decided to take a different approach. We tested whether a consent model, where people are asked whether they consent to having their data shared with their election office for voting registration purposes, would increase opt-in rates.
We found that when we switched over to a consent model, half of the participants answered “yes” to the consent question — a huge improvement to the original opt-in rate.
Participants answered “yes” to the consent question at a much higher rate than Medicaid applicants
answer “yes” to the current explicit voter registration question. This indicates that the consent model is a
more effective way of satisfying Section 7 of NVRA.
We tested four different versions of the consent question. Each one had a different tone:
We learned that participants always preferred plain language, but sometimes they wanted more details.
Participants cited good reasons for both positions (the beginning and the end of the application):
“It’s better to be upfront about this”
“This would sum up the application better, at the end”
This research was conducted for the Institute for Responsive Government by Sean Johnson, Isabelle Yisak, and Evie Lacroix.
We held usability testing sessions with 24 participants in Denver and Aurora.
How we recruited:
We tested a data consent model for AVR on the PEAK multibenefit application.
The main questions that drove our research were:
Visit our page on voter registration to learn best practices for different registration policies including automatic voter registration, same-day voter registration and online voter registration.