Electronic pollbooks (e-pollbooks) extend voter registration database technology to the polling place, providing a digital system to look up, identify, and authorize voters, rather than relying on printed poll books. This report focuses on the usability and accessibility of e-pollbooks — how poll workers and voters interact with them — rather than their technical features or value in election administration. Because e-pollbooks have no formal usability requirements, their user interfaces had an opportunity to innovate in ways that voting systems did not, and we were interested in seeing how those designs had evolved.
This research was published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) as VTS 100-3pt1, also available on NIST’s website.
Note: This publication is reporting on research that was conducted in 2017. The use of e-pollbooks presented throughout the document reflects the state of elections in 2017.
HiBy 2017, there was wide interest in using e-pollbooks to improve election administration. These products were developed in an open market without regulatory standards, leaving the vendors freedom to design the product, and the user interface, in many different ways. Those differences can have a significant impact on how easy it is for poll workers, who work a very long day, to quickly and accurately complete the check-in process and other associated activities, so usability is an important feature of an e-pollbook.
Because the basic check-in scenario is repeated over and over during an election day, the most important usability attributes of e-pollbooks are the efficiency and accuracy with which poll workers can complete the interaction. Efficiency is important because checking in voters is one of the bottlenecks that can cause long lines at a polling place.
There are many different styles of icons and choice of indicators. Although red-amber-green or blue is often used for color coding status indicators for voted-problems-ready, there is not a lot of consistency across e-pollbooks.
At the time of this landscape analysis, very few of the vendors or election office designers mentioned accessibility. Accessible e-pollbooks can enable people with disabilities to work as poll workers — which is also a good way to support voters with disabilities better.
This research was conducted by Lynn Baumeister, Whitney Quesenbery and Shanée Dawkins (from NIST).
The goal of the project was to understand current interface designs and interactions, and how e-pollbooks could be evaluated for usability. Information was sourced from demonstrations of e-pollbook systems, poll worker manuals and training materials from several jurisdictions, and reviews of reports from election officials about pilot studies or other projects that consider the use of e-pollbooks in their jurisdiction. Specifically, demonstrations were with:
The focus was on the usability for poll workers, as well as how election staff uses them before, during, and after Election Day.
Visit our page on voting systems to find more resources about the usability and accessibility of voting systems.